Only Part of the Problem

Dead: 27

Age Range: 6-56

Bullets Per Victim: 2-11

Guns Used: 3

Monster: 1

Hundreds, if not thousands, of pieces (like this one) have already been written in response to the recent atrocity that was the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, where 20 children and six adults were brutally murdered by 20-year-old Adam Lanza. While investigators continue to dig for answers, the nation as a whole has initiated numerous dialogues regarding the prevention of similar incidents in the future. 

The brunt of the discussions have revolved around the long-standing issue of gun control, which is indeed a problem. But there are others. 

As shown above, the nation with the fewest regulations on firearms (of those listed) struggled the most when it came to homicide. Certainly it is a graphic with an agenda, but the numbers cannot be argued with: loose gun regulation will inevitably allow for more murders. 

But Sandy Hook is not about gun control. And here's why:

1. Connecticut has one of the nation's strictest arms regulation policies. According to the Washington Times, to own a gun in the state, one must apply for a permit after the age of 21 and undergo both a safety course and background check. If a national gun control plan was to be launched, it would most likely look something like this. 

That being said, Lanza was a mere twenty-years-old, and not legally permitted to own a firearm. But using force, he obtained one anyways. Were any gun control legislation to be passed, the law would be intended for a sector of the population that wouldn't comply regardless. As Henry D'Andrea says in his article, "Criminals don't follow laws they don't want to; that's why they're criminals in the first place."

2. Rather than reacting to this event with cries for stricter gun control, we as a nation should embrace reform in how we deal with mental illness. Although we will never know exactly what was going through Lanza's mind as he committed undoubtedly the crime of the year, if not the decade, mental health certainly played a role.

Illnesses of the mind --depression, anxiety, OCD-- have over time accumulated an associated stigma. In addition to causing detriment to those diagnosed, this stigma also prevents potentially ill patients from reaching out for help in the first place.

This pigeonholing occurs not only on the playground or in the high school classroom, but throughout one's life. Studies show that 20% of employees who divulge their mental illness to their employers are then let go.

Even if patients do bolster up the courage to seek help, oftentimes they find it unavailable. From 2009 to 2011, nearly $1.6 billion in funding was cut from mental health spending, closing clinics and leaving patients without care.

Lanza's act was not one of spontaneity. A lifetime of mental anguish and social neglect erupted last Friday, an eruption that, with access to the proper medical care, could have been curbed.

3. By posthumously delving into the life of Adam Lanza, the media is playing right into his game. In committing this massacre, Lanza sought in death what he seemingly did not receive in life: attention. And he's not alone in this pursuit.

Lanza has received in the past few days more attention, albeit negative, than anyone else in the country. After years of trying to get noticed, he resorted to the dastardly in a last ditch attempt to have his name remembered.

Time after time the media has "monsterized" the culprits of these mass murders, allowing others seeking recognition an outlet to attain it. Although these criminals are remembered in a negative light, they are remembered.

The media should focus their efforts not on picking apart the suspect, but on learning from their actions. Separate the incident from the issue of gun control. Raise mental health awareness. Move forward.

Saudi Arabia and Paul Collier's The Bottom Billion

Although the kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not currently fall into Paul Collier’s “Bottom Billion,” the nation is not inherently devoid of the traps introduced by the esteemed economist: conflict, natural resource, landlocked, and bad governance. To best approach the question of Saudi Arabia’s “trap involvement,” I will break up this blog post into four sections, addressing each complexity individually.

The Conflict Trap

By Collier’s definition (1,000 combat deaths, each side suffering at least five percent of these deaths), Saudi Arabia has never experienced a civil war or coup. The two principal causalities of internal conflict outlined by Collier are low initial income and slow growth or decline. According to the World Factbook, Saudi Arabia has the world’s 24^th largest economy, with a GDP per capita that ranks 56^th in the world. Although neither statistic jumps off the page, the more important figure is Saudi Arabia’s 7.1% growth rate this previous calendar year. Low income can be dealt with, looked at with hope for improvement. But a depleted growth rate breeds economic despondency. As stated by Collier, “each percentage point added to the growth rate knocks off a percentage point from this risk [of Civil War].” This risk was minimal to begin with, due to the state’s relative economic prosperity. But factoring in the high rate of economic development, this possibility is almost eradicated.

Collier also discusses a country’s dependence on exports in relation to its risk of civil war. Although Saudi Arabia is heavily dependent on its oil industry, the government has managed to supervise its extraction and production. Although initially providing international companies (Texaco, Socal) a role in the industry, Saudi Arabia has since essentially nationalized the natural resource under the government-run Saudi Aramco, thus limiting the potential for exploitation.

The Natural Resource Trap

Depending on the day, Saudi Arabia has in its possession the largest or second largest collection of oil reserves in the world, controlling up to one fifth of the planets supply of this precious natural resource. Collier argues that “over time, countries with large resource discoveries can end up poorer.” But he goes on to mention that, “if you have enough natural resources you can afford to forget about normal economic activity. This is the situation in Saudi Arabia.”

Al-Shaybah Oil Field

Because such a large percentage of the Saudi Arabian economy is this oil industry (90% of the country’s exports are petroleum-based), its prevalence on the international marketplace does not bring about the “resource curse,” better known as “Dutch Disease,” in which the dominance of one national industry diminishes the effectiveness of the others due to an increase in the value of said nation’s currency.  

Saudi Arabia has also proven responsible with its oil revenue, keeping expenditures to a minimum and currently holding the sixth best budget surplus in the world at 13.8% of the GDP. Therefore, unlike Nigeria in the 1980’s, Saudi Arabia will not collapse upon itself in the event of a drop in oil prices.

Finally, as Saudi Arabia is a autocratic monarchy, it has been able to steer clear of the corruption associated with democracies rich in resources. Patronage politics play no role in the choosing of political leaders, and taxes remain relevant as they make up 50.3% of the GDP.

Landlocked With Bad Neighbors Trap

Of all the traps presented by Collier in his analysis, "Landlocked with Bad Neighbors" proves the least relevant to Saudi Arabia's situation. Not only does Saudi Arabia lie on a peninsula with 2,640 kilometers of coastline, but the Suez Canal and Strait of Aden allow Saudi Arabia to bypass its direct neighbors if it so chooses and trade with the rest of the world, which is what the nation does. In 2011, 13.9% of Saudi Arabian exports (essentially oil) went to Japan, 13.6% to China, 13.4% to the United States, 10.2% to South Korea, 7.8% to India, 4.8% to Singapore, with the remaining 36.3% scattered throughout the globe. Saudi Arabia's geography has done nothing to affect it's economic and political stature other than bless the country with an abundance of natural oil reserves. Where Saudi Arabia is located does not prevent it from interacting with any other nation in particular, and it has the infrastructure in place to be able to do this.

Bad Governance Trap

Collier argues that there exists a ceiling applicable to a country's growth rate, but no basement. Under even the most effective regimes, rarely will a nation exceed growth of 10% in one year. But poor leadership can tank an economy immediately. Since King Abdullah assumed power in 2006, only once has the economic growth rate fallen under one percent, and never has the Gross Domestic Product actually shrunk.

Given the amount of natural resources available to Saudi Arabia, the kingdom just "has to avoid doing harm rather than actively do much good." As long as the infrastructure to export commodities like oil is in place, which it is, Saudi Arabia will succeed economically.

That is not to say the monarchic system of government present in Saudi Arabia is perfect- it's not. There exists little to no religious freedom, women have been subjugated for centuries, and censorship runs rampant. But these vices do not prevent Saudi Arabia from prospering economically, and therefore this nation does not fall under the bad governance trap.